News & Resources

Accepting Valuable Paintings: Special Ethical Obligations?

Bequests in the News
March 27, 2026

Desirable paintings are on the canvas.

The donor’s heirs want the highly appreciated assets back, while the charitable owners wish to keep – or more often – sell them to fund non-artistic needs. Paintings have become the rainy-day fund for many organizations.

In recent years, we’ve seen:

  • the Plainfield case (town wishes to sell nineteenth-century paintings that have become politically incorrect; court declines and suggests donation to a museum)
  • the Adler case (descendants of German national who sold rare Picasso in 1938 for $1500 to finance escape from Germany want return of now $100 million painting from Guggenheim Museum under broad interpretation of Nazi looting law)
  • the Orlando Museum case (museum wants to use $1.8 million gift designated for art purchases for more mundane overhead-type costs to ease financial crisis)
And now the Valparaiso University case, where the school seeks court approval to sell a Georgia O’Keefe painting acquired with funds from a restricted bequest in 1962 for a pittance and is now worth $15 million.

This article was originally posted on our LinkedIn on November 25, 2024.